<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 508 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116572</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission rejected the Revenue&#039;s Review Application seeking to withdraw immunities granted to the applicant in a customs duty evasion case. The Commission emphasized the finality of its orders and criticized the Revenue for flouting the Final Order, relying on fresh evidence post-settlement, and showing indifference towards compliance. The judgment underscored the importance of upholding Settlement Commission decisions, discouraging attempts to circumvent settled cases through new investigations. The Revenue was held accountable for its actions and reminded of the obligation to adhere to legal procedures and respect Commission orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 508 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116572</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission rejected the Revenue&#039;s Review Application seeking to withdraw immunities granted to the applicant in a customs duty evasion case. The Commission emphasized the finality of its orders and criticized the Revenue for flouting the Final Order, relying on fresh evidence post-settlement, and showing indifference towards compliance. The judgment underscored the importance of upholding Settlement Commission decisions, discouraging attempts to circumvent settled cases through new investigations. The Revenue was held accountable for its actions and reminded of the obligation to adhere to legal procedures and respect Commission orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>