<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 504 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116568</link>
    <description>Rebate on export clearances could not be reduced on the footing that the assessee should have claimed a concessional exemption instead of paying duty at the higher rate. The goods were cleared on payment of duty, and no objection was raised at clearance stage; the dispute arose only when the rebate claim was processed. The applicable principle is that an exemption notification is optional, and an assessee cannot be forced to avail it if it chose not to. Rebate was therefore allowable on the duty actually paid, and curtailment of the excess rebate was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 504 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116568</link>
      <description>Rebate on export clearances could not be reduced on the footing that the assessee should have claimed a concessional exemption instead of paying duty at the higher rate. The goods were cleared on payment of duty, and no objection was raised at clearance stage; the dispute arose only when the rebate claim was processed. The applicable principle is that an exemption notification is optional, and an assessee cannot be forced to avail it if it chose not to. Rebate was therefore allowable on the duty actually paid, and curtailment of the excess rebate was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>