<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 518 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116564</link>
    <description>DEPB benefit on packing material was available where the contemporaneous record showed that the exporter&#039;s actual claim was confined to packing material used for export goods. A mistaken shipping declaration referring to the exported goods themselves did not, by itself, justify denial of the benefit when later correspondence clarified the intended claim. On that basis, intentional misdeclaration was not established, and the benefit was held admissible on the packing material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 518 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116564</link>
      <description>DEPB benefit on packing material was available where the contemporaneous record showed that the exporter&#039;s actual claim was confined to packing material used for export goods. A mistaken shipping declaration referring to the exported goods themselves did not, by itself, justify denial of the benefit when later correspondence clarified the intended claim. On that basis, intentional misdeclaration was not established, and the benefit was held admissible on the packing material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>