<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116560</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals as there was no shortage of inputs, no clearance of final products without duty payment, and insufficient evidence to support the confiscation of the currency. The demand based on excess raw material receipt and duty-free finished goods clearance was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized discrepancies in stock quantities but found the private record entries to be approximate, ruling in favor of the appellants due to the lack of concrete evidence linking truck movements to duty-free goods clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116560</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals as there was no shortage of inputs, no clearance of final products without duty payment, and insufficient evidence to support the confiscation of the currency. The demand based on excess raw material receipt and duty-free finished goods clearance was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized discrepancies in stock quantities but found the private record entries to be approximate, ruling in favor of the appellants due to the lack of concrete evidence linking truck movements to duty-free goods clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>