<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 366 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rolling shutters as doors under Heading 7308.30 of the Customs Tariff Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under Heading 7308.90. The decision was based on the definition of doors and the purpose of rolling shutters in closing off entrances, aligning with the specific headings in the tariff schedule. The judgment emphasizes the importance of interpreting common parlance and dictionary definitions in determining the correct classification of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 366 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rolling shutters as doors under Heading 7308.30 of the Customs Tariff Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under Heading 7308.90. The decision was based on the definition of doors and the purpose of rolling shutters in closing off entrances, aligning with the specific headings in the tariff schedule. The judgment emphasizes the importance of interpreting common parlance and dictionary definitions in determining the correct classification of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>