<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 497 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116518</link>
    <description>Extension of the export-obligation period under the EPCG scheme by the competent foreign trade authority altered the basis on which the earlier stay and demand had been made. Once the licence period was extended and the appellant undertook to meet the export obligation within that revised period, the pre-deposit/stay order and consequential recovery could not continue on the earlier default basis. The matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the original authority, with further proceedings to follow only if the extended obligation was not fulfilled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 497 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116518</link>
      <description>Extension of the export-obligation period under the EPCG scheme by the competent foreign trade authority altered the basis on which the earlier stay and demand had been made. Once the licence period was extended and the appellant undertook to meet the export obligation within that revised period, the pre-deposit/stay order and consequential recovery could not continue on the earlier default basis. The matter was remanded for de novo consideration by the original authority, with further proceedings to follow only if the extended obligation was not fulfilled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>