<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 490 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of INR 1,64,344 imposed on the appellants for their failure to produce proof of export in the manufacture and export of footwear. The documents submitted were photocopies instead of the required attested copies, leading to the rejection of the appeal and confirmation of the duty demand and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 490 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand of INR 1,64,344 imposed on the appellants for their failure to produce proof of export in the manufacture and export of footwear. The documents submitted were photocopies instead of the required attested copies, leading to the rejection of the appeal and confirmation of the duty demand and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>