https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116501 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to set aside demands by the Revenue due to lack of evidence of clandestine removal of goods. The Commissioner confirmed demands totaling Rs. 3,16,735/- and imposed redemption fine, penalty, and interest, which were upheld by the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal set aside the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB and the imposition of fine, penalty, and personal penalties under Additional Duties of Excise based on legal precedents and circulars, allowing the cross-appeal to that extent. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the cross-appeal was partially allowed. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:53:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116501 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to set aside demands by the Revenue due to lack of evidence of clandestine removal of goods. The Commissioner confirmed demands totaling Rs. 3,16,735/- and imposed redemption fine, penalty, and interest, which were upheld by the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal set aside the confirmation of interest under Section 11AB and the imposition of fine, penalty, and personal penalties under Additional Duties of Excise based on legal precedents and circulars, allowing the cross-appeal to that extent. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the cross-appeal was partially allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116501