https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116490 Imported goods were examined for compliance with country-of-origin marking requirements where the notification allowed the origin to be shown either on the goods themselves or on the packages for goods covered by Serial No. 26. The relevant schedule was read as permitting package marking for goods not specifically described in Serial Nos. 1 to 25, and Clause 4 was not treated as imposing a further impracticability condition on Serial No. 26. Because the origin marking appeared on the cartons, the statutory marking requirement was satisfied and confiscation was held unsustainable. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:53:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116490 Imported goods were examined for compliance with country-of-origin marking requirements where the notification allowed the origin to be shown either on the goods themselves or on the packages for goods covered by Serial No. 26. The relevant schedule was read as permitting package marking for goods not specifically described in Serial Nos. 1 to 25, and Clause 4 was not treated as imposing a further impracticability condition on Serial No. 26. Because the origin marking appeared on the cartons, the statutory marking requirement was satisfied and confiscation was held unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116490