https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116483 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the demands and penalties due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal and shortage of raw materials. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing concrete evidence to substantiate claims of duty evasion and upheld the principle that mere consumption of one raw material was not enough to prove clandestine activities. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:29:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116483 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the demands and penalties due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal and shortage of raw materials. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing concrete evidence to substantiate claims of duty evasion and upheld the principle that mere consumption of one raw material was not enough to prove clandestine activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116483