https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116478 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Order-in-Appeal confirming the confiscation of branded goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty on the appellants for using brand names 'Turnado' and 'Yamaha' without proper license/registration. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not own the brand names as they claimed, leading to the dismissal of their appeal. This case underscores the importance of ensuring proper ownership and registration of brand names to comply with Central Excise laws and avoid legal liabilities and penalties. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:08:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116478 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Order-in-Appeal confirming the confiscation of branded goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty on the appellants for using brand names 'Turnado' and 'Yamaha' without proper license/registration. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not own the brand names as they claimed, leading to the dismissal of their appeal. This case underscores the importance of ensuring proper ownership and registration of brand names to comply with Central Excise laws and avoid legal liabilities and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116478