<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 504 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116477</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision that an additional amount paid by the importer to the ship&#039;s owner as an out-of-court settlement should not be added to the assessable value of the imported vessel. The Tribunal found that the payment was a business expenditure unrelated to the vessel&#039;s value, emphasizing the lack of connection between the extra payment and the sale price of the vessel. The judgment highlights the importance of considering the nature of additional payments in determining the assessable value of imported goods and the necessity of adhering to established legal principles in customs valuation cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 504 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116477</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision that an additional amount paid by the importer to the ship&#039;s owner as an out-of-court settlement should not be added to the assessable value of the imported vessel. The Tribunal found that the payment was a business expenditure unrelated to the vessel&#039;s value, emphasizing the lack of connection between the extra payment and the sale price of the vessel. The judgment highlights the importance of considering the nature of additional payments in determining the assessable value of imported goods and the necessity of adhering to established legal principles in customs valuation cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>