<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 457 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered re-valuation of export Rough Diamonds by independent experts chosen by both parties, addressing concerns over the initial valuation process. The case involved disputes over the goods&#039; value, confiscation by the Commissioner, and a plea for re-valuation not addressed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal emphasized fairness and transparency, remanding the matter for a final decision by the Adjudicating Authority to uphold procedural integrity in customs proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:48:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 457 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered re-valuation of export Rough Diamonds by independent experts chosen by both parties, addressing concerns over the initial valuation process. The case involved disputes over the goods&#039; value, confiscation by the Commissioner, and a plea for re-valuation not addressed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal emphasized fairness and transparency, remanding the matter for a final decision by the Adjudicating Authority to uphold procedural integrity in customs proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>