<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116447</link>
    <description>An amendment to the exemption notification for 100% Export Oriented Units, which only expanded the duty reference language, did not extinguish the separate exemption available under Notification No. 55/91-C.E. or create a fresh liability for Domestic Tariff Area clearances. The departmental circular adopting the contrary view was therefore unsustainable. On the same reasoning, the Revenue&#039;s rectification application was rejected, and the earlier order was maintained because the amended text did not clearly and expressly impose additional excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116447</link>
      <description>An amendment to the exemption notification for 100% Export Oriented Units, which only expanded the duty reference language, did not extinguish the separate exemption available under Notification No. 55/91-C.E. or create a fresh liability for Domestic Tariff Area clearances. The departmental circular adopting the contrary view was therefore unsustainable. On the same reasoning, the Revenue&#039;s rectification application was rejected, and the earlier order was maintained because the amended text did not clearly and expressly impose additional excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>