<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 692 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116433</link>
    <description>Notification No. 67/95-C.E. applies only where captive inputs are used to manufacture dutiable final products cleared on payment of duty. Re-processed granules made from captive waste and scrap were cleared at nil rate under Notification No. 131/95-C.E., so they could not be treated as goods cleared on payment of duty. The contention that a nil rate of duty was equivalent to duty payment was rejected, and the exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was therefore unavailable for the captive waste and scrap.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:20:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 692 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116433</link>
      <description>Notification No. 67/95-C.E. applies only where captive inputs are used to manufacture dutiable final products cleared on payment of duty. Re-processed granules made from captive waste and scrap were cleared at nil rate under Notification No. 131/95-C.E., so they could not be treated as goods cleared on payment of duty. The contention that a nil rate of duty was equivalent to duty payment was rejected, and the exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. was therefore unavailable for the captive waste and scrap.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>