<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 360 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicants&#039; stay applications regarding the recovery of duty and penalty imposed under an order due to lack of evidence supporting the claimed purity of zinc ingots imported. While the purity claim lacked direct evidence, the weight declaration discrepancy was upheld based on international trade norms. The applicants were directed to pre-deposit a significant sum within a specified period to stay the recovery of the balance duty and penalty amount, considering the substantial duty evasion resulting from the weight discrepancy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:17:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 360 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicants&#039; stay applications regarding the recovery of duty and penalty imposed under an order due to lack of evidence supporting the claimed purity of zinc ingots imported. While the purity claim lacked direct evidence, the weight declaration discrepancy was upheld based on international trade norms. The applicants were directed to pre-deposit a significant sum within a specified period to stay the recovery of the balance duty and penalty amount, considering the substantial duty evasion resulting from the weight discrepancy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>