<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 492 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116411</link>
    <description>Refund of customs duty based on a different tariff classification was held not maintainable where the original assessment was never challenged in accordance with law. Payment under protest did not by itself permit reopening the assessment in refund proceedings, because the assessee had acquiesced in the assessed classification and waived the right to contest it later. The legal bar against indirectly assailing an unchallenged assessment therefore applied, and the refund claim failed for want of a prior lawful challenge to the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 492 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116411</link>
      <description>Refund of customs duty based on a different tariff classification was held not maintainable where the original assessment was never challenged in accordance with law. Payment under protest did not by itself permit reopening the assessment in refund proceedings, because the assessee had acquiesced in the assessed classification and waived the right to contest it later. The legal bar against indirectly assailing an unchallenged assessment therefore applied, and the refund claim failed for want of a prior lawful challenge to the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>