<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 486 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116405</link>
    <description>In valuation of fabrics processed on a job work basis, the assessable value includes the grey cloth value, job work charges, manufacturing expenses, and manufacturing profit. Expenses incurred up to the point the goods leave the processor&#039;s factory are includible whether borne by the processor or the supplier, and job charges do not replace these separate valuation elements. Where an actual factory-gate sale price is unavailable, the assessing authority may determine value on a best judgment basis by considering relevant records and comparable profit margins. The inclusion of manufacturing expenses and manufacturing profit was upheld, and the valuation challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 486 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116405</link>
      <description>In valuation of fabrics processed on a job work basis, the assessable value includes the grey cloth value, job work charges, manufacturing expenses, and manufacturing profit. Expenses incurred up to the point the goods leave the processor&#039;s factory are includible whether borne by the processor or the supplier, and job charges do not replace these separate valuation elements. Where an actual factory-gate sale price is unavailable, the assessing authority may determine value on a best judgment basis by considering relevant records and comparable profit margins. The inclusion of manufacturing expenses and manufacturing profit was upheld, and the valuation challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>