<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the customs authorities&#039; assessment of an imported consignment of Phenol at a higher value than the invoice price, ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Decorative Laminated sheets. The Tribunal found that the transaction value should have been accepted for assessment purposes, as there were no valid reasons provided for rejecting it. The Tribunal emphasized the commercial nature of the transaction and the lack of justification for adopting the value of identical goods for assessment. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the customs authorities&#039; assessment of an imported consignment of Phenol at a higher value than the invoice price, ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Decorative Laminated sheets. The Tribunal found that the transaction value should have been accepted for assessment purposes, as there were no valid reasons provided for rejecting it. The Tribunal emphasized the commercial nature of the transaction and the lack of justification for adopting the value of identical goods for assessment. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>