<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 468 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116387</link>
    <description>Storage tanks specially designed for industrial gas storage were treated as eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they functioned as accessories or components of the plant. The analysis turned on serial No. 5 of the Rule 57Q table, which allows credit for plant accessories and components, and on the tanks&#039; operational role in preventing evaporation and leakage. The tanks were distinguished from equipment used merely to store inputs, and from cases where the relevant provision was not considered. On that basis, denial of credit was found unsustainable, and entitlement to Modvat credit was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 468 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116387</link>
      <description>Storage tanks specially designed for industrial gas storage were treated as eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q because they functioned as accessories or components of the plant. The analysis turned on serial No. 5 of the Rule 57Q table, which allows credit for plant accessories and components, and on the tanks&#039; operational role in preventing evaporation and leakage. The tanks were distinguished from equipment used merely to store inputs, and from cases where the relevant provision was not considered. On that basis, denial of credit was found unsustainable, and entitlement to Modvat credit was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>