https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116382 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the confiscation of imported rough marble slabs by Customs authorities. Despite allegations of mis-declaration and discrepancies in test reports, the Tribunal found that the goods matched the description under the advance license. The conflicting reports from I.I.T. Mumbai and the insignificant quantity variance led the Tribunal to conclude that the confiscation was unjustified. The impugned Order was set aside, and the appeal of the appellants was allowed due to the inconsistencies in the test reports and the minimal quantity difference. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:41:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116382 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving the confiscation of imported rough marble slabs by Customs authorities. Despite allegations of mis-declaration and discrepancies in test reports, the Tribunal found that the goods matched the description under the advance license. The conflicting reports from I.I.T. Mumbai and the insignificant quantity variance led the Tribunal to conclude that the confiscation was unjustified. The impugned Order was set aside, and the appeal of the appellants was allowed due to the inconsistencies in the test reports and the minimal quantity difference. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116382