<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 453 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116381</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the appellant&#039;s refund claim and upheld a demand with a penalty under the Central Excise Act. The issue pertained to Additional Duties of Excise on Embroidered Fabrics under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The demands were not sustained following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Venus Castings. The tribunal granted a full waiver and stay, allowing both parties to request an out-of-turn hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 453 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116381</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the appellant&#039;s refund claim and upheld a demand with a penalty under the Central Excise Act. The issue pertained to Additional Duties of Excise on Embroidered Fabrics under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The demands were not sustained following the precedent set by the Supreme Court in the case of Venus Castings. The tribunal granted a full waiver and stay, allowing both parties to request an out-of-turn hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>