<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 444 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116372</link>
    <description>The tribunal affirmed the rejection of refund claims totaling Rs. 8,941 due to unjust enrichment concerns. Despite the absence of unjust enrichment as a ground in the show cause notice, claimants must prove no unjust enrichment under Section 11B. Relying solely on customer debit notes was insufficient to establish lack of unjust enrichment, following precedents like Grasim Industries and S. Kumar&#039;s Ltd. The tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the burden on claimants to demonstrate compliance with unjust enrichment requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 444 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116372</link>
      <description>The tribunal affirmed the rejection of refund claims totaling Rs. 8,941 due to unjust enrichment concerns. Despite the absence of unjust enrichment as a ground in the show cause notice, claimants must prove no unjust enrichment under Section 11B. Relying solely on customer debit notes was insufficient to establish lack of unjust enrichment, following precedents like Grasim Industries and S. Kumar&#039;s Ltd. The tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the burden on claimants to demonstrate compliance with unjust enrichment requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>