<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 432 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116360</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai granted full waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery in a case involving addition of amount paid to a contractor for warranty period services. No evidence of artificial depression in sale price was found, leading to no prima facie reason to uphold duty demand. The matter was fixed for regular hearing on 25-7-2005 after an early hearing application was considered and disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 432 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116360</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai granted full waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery in a case involving addition of amount paid to a contractor for warranty period services. No evidence of artificial depression in sale price was found, leading to no prima facie reason to uphold duty demand. The matter was fixed for regular hearing on 25-7-2005 after an early hearing application was considered and disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>