<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 431 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant, a PSU Unit, a full waiver of pre-deposit in a case concerning the obligation to pay differential duty on varying amounts between Actual Railway Freight (ARF) and Notional Railway Freight (NRF) received from the Oil Coordination Committee (OCC) through the Oil Pool Account (OPA). The Tribunal held that the appellant had a strong prima facie case supported by binding judgments and Circulars, warranting the waiver. The stay order was allowed, halting the recovery of amounts until the appeal&#039;s final disposal, emphasizing that financial hardship should not influence the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 431 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant, a PSU Unit, a full waiver of pre-deposit in a case concerning the obligation to pay differential duty on varying amounts between Actual Railway Freight (ARF) and Notional Railway Freight (NRF) received from the Oil Coordination Committee (OCC) through the Oil Pool Account (OPA). The Tribunal held that the appellant had a strong prima facie case supported by binding judgments and Circulars, warranting the waiver. The stay order was allowed, halting the recovery of amounts until the appeal&#039;s final disposal, emphasizing that financial hardship should not influence the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>