https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116310 The CESTAT, Mumbai, concluded that the importers of Marble Blocks did not commit misdeclaration regarding weight, recognizing the trade practice of invoicing based on chargeable weight. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation orders under Sections 111(l) & 111(m) and the penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the appeal. en-us Fri, 20 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2024 10:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116310 The CESTAT, Mumbai, concluded that the importers of Marble Blocks did not commit misdeclaration regarding weight, recognizing the trade practice of invoicing based on chargeable weight. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation orders under Sections 111(l) & 111(m) and the penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116310