<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 505 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116309</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalties in some cases while setting aside the orders in others. The judgments addressed burden of proof, validity of retracted statements, evidence of legal importation, and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962, providing relief based on lack of conclusive evidence and benefit of doubt. The tribunal found discrepancies in test reports, leading to confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on some parties under relevant sections of the Customs Act, 1962. Transport documents&#039; verification and penalties on transporters for abetting smuggling were also considered, with penalties being set aside in one case due to insufficient evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:14:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 505 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116309</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation and penalties in some cases while setting aside the orders in others. The judgments addressed burden of proof, validity of retracted statements, evidence of legal importation, and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962, providing relief based on lack of conclusive evidence and benefit of doubt. The tribunal found discrepancies in test reports, leading to confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on some parties under relevant sections of the Customs Act, 1962. Transport documents&#039; verification and penalties on transporters for abetting smuggling were also considered, with penalties being set aside in one case due to insufficient evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>