https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116292 The Tribunal recorded that the Board's circular of 26 February 2002 directs that coercive recovery action should not be taken while a survey is initiated for issuing or examining a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Department undertook to follow that directive. On that basis, the circular was treated as operative for the pending survey proceedings. In view of that undertaking, the applicants did not press the stay applications, and the Tribunal disposed of them as not pressed, while preserving liberty to file fresh applications if circumstances change. en-us Thu, 12 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:39:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116292 The Tribunal recorded that the Board's circular of 26 February 2002 directs that coercive recovery action should not be taken while a survey is initiated for issuing or examining a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Department undertook to follow that directive. On that basis, the circular was treated as operative for the pending survey proceedings. In view of that undertaking, the applicants did not press the stay applications, and the Tribunal disposed of them as not pressed, while preserving liberty to file fresh applications if circumstances change. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116292