<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 475 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116279</link>
    <description>The Commissioner found no irregular availment of Modvat credit due to the absence of dealer registration requirements during the relevant period and the timely filing of returns. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the documents met statutory requirements despite being from non-Registered Dealers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s findings and highlighting the absence of flaws in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 475 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116279</link>
      <description>The Commissioner found no irregular availment of Modvat credit due to the absence of dealer registration requirements during the relevant period and the timely filing of returns. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the documents met statutory requirements despite being from non-Registered Dealers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s findings and highlighting the absence of flaws in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>