<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 491 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116255</link>
    <description>Amounts collected from dealers for printing their particulars on free diaries were treated as a separate activity from the manufacture and sale of electric fans. On that prima facie basis, the dispute over duty demand was considered fit for interim protection, and the tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed demand pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 491 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116255</link>
      <description>Amounts collected from dealers for printing their particulars on free diaries were treated as a separate activity from the manufacture and sale of electric fans. On that prima facie basis, the dispute over duty demand was considered fit for interim protection, and the tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed demand pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>