<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 460 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for depositing cheques with the Chief Accounts Officer and immediately taking credit in their PLA before clearing the goods. The Revenue failed to prove that the Chief Accounts Officer lacked authority to collect the cheques and did not take any administrative action against the officer. As the bank honored the cheques without issues of insufficient funds, the Tribunal found no justification for the penalty and ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 10:25:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 460 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for depositing cheques with the Chief Accounts Officer and immediately taking credit in their PLA before clearing the goods. The Revenue failed to prove that the Chief Accounts Officer lacked authority to collect the cheques and did not take any administrative action against the officer. As the bank honored the cheques without issues of insufficient funds, the Tribunal found no justification for the penalty and ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>