<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 458 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116222</link>
    <description>Notification No. 108/95-C.E. granted exemption only on prior production of a certificate from the United Nations or an International Organisation confirming official use or supply to an approved project financed by that organisation. The Tribunal treated this documentary requirement as a condition precedent, not a procedural formality, and held that strict compliance was necessary for the exemption. It also noted that the later amended notification required a certificate from the nodal ministry in the Government of India, which was likewise not produced, and a project authority certificate could not replace the prescribed document. The exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 10:20:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 458 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116222</link>
      <description>Notification No. 108/95-C.E. granted exemption only on prior production of a certificate from the United Nations or an International Organisation confirming official use or supply to an approved project financed by that organisation. The Tribunal treated this documentary requirement as a condition precedent, not a procedural formality, and held that strict compliance was necessary for the exemption. It also noted that the later amended notification required a certificate from the nodal ministry in the Government of India, which was likewise not produced, and a project authority certificate could not replace the prescribed document. The exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>