https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116211 Additional documents could be produced in support of a stay petition because Rule 23 of the CEGAT Procedure Rules did not bar their filing at that stage. The Tribunal found the documents relevant to the stay application and rejected the objection that no additional evidence could be taken on record, so the miscellaneous applications for production of additional documents were allowed. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:30:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116211 Additional documents could be produced in support of a stay petition because Rule 23 of the CEGAT Procedure Rules did not bar their filing at that stage. The Tribunal found the documents relevant to the stay application and rejected the objection that no additional evidence could be taken on record, so the miscellaneous applications for production of additional documents were allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116211