<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 446 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116209</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that Notification 148/94-Customs does not mandate certificates of end-use distribution to be signed solely by a District Magistrate. A prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962 was established. The matter is set for regular hearing on 3-6-2005, and the application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 446 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116209</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that Notification 148/94-Customs does not mandate certificates of end-use distribution to be signed solely by a District Magistrate. A prima facie case for full waiver of pre-deposit under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962 was established. The matter is set for regular hearing on 3-6-2005, and the application was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>