<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 441 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116204</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision that forwarding charges should not be included in the assessable value of goods for excise duty calculation. The Tribunal emphasized that since the sale was deemed to occur at the factory gate and freight charges were excluded, forwarding charges related to activities after the sale and should not impact the assessable value. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the exclusion of forwarding charges from the duty calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 441 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116204</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision that forwarding charges should not be included in the assessable value of goods for excise duty calculation. The Tribunal emphasized that since the sale was deemed to occur at the factory gate and freight charges were excluded, forwarding charges related to activities after the sale and should not impact the assessable value. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the exclusion of forwarding charges from the duty calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>