<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 439 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the customs authorities&#039; decision to enhance the value of imported goods due to insufficient information in the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate. The confiscation of the goods was upheld, but the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs. The importance of accurate valuation of imported goods and the necessity for proper supporting documentation were emphasized in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 18:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 439 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the customs authorities&#039; decision to enhance the value of imported goods due to insufficient information in the Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate. The confiscation of the goods was upheld, but the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs. The importance of accurate valuation of imported goods and the necessity for proper supporting documentation were emphasized in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>