<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 685 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s restoration application seeking to recall the order for pre-deposit and the subsequent dismissal of the appeal, as these orders were considered merged with the High Court&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal held that reviewing the already merged orders would not be permissible. The applicant&#039;s attempts through writ petitions were unsuccessful, leading to the dismissal of the restoration application. The decision was made on 29-3-2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 685 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s restoration application seeking to recall the order for pre-deposit and the subsequent dismissal of the appeal, as these orders were considered merged with the High Court&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal held that reviewing the already merged orders would not be permissible. The applicant&#039;s attempts through writ petitions were unsuccessful, leading to the dismissal of the restoration application. The decision was made on 29-3-2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>