<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 680 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the duty demand against the appellants was unsustainable as the obligation to obtain material duty-free against CT-3 certificates rested with the user unit, not the supplier. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, absolving the appellants of the duty demand and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 680 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the duty demand against the appellants was unsustainable as the obligation to obtain material duty-free against CT-3 certificates rested with the user unit, not the supplier. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, absolving the appellants of the duty demand and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>