<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 667 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116174</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed Modvat credit on ingots for all final products manufactured by the assessee, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision disallowing credit on aluminium. The Tribunal emphasized that since ingots were common inputs for all items produced, credit should be permissible for all final products, not restricted to a specific product. This ruling highlights the importance of recognizing common inputs and granting credit accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 667 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116174</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed Modvat credit on ingots for all final products manufactured by the assessee, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision disallowing credit on aluminium. The Tribunal emphasized that since ingots were common inputs for all items produced, credit should be permissible for all final products, not restricted to a specific product. This ruling highlights the importance of recognizing common inputs and granting credit accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>