<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 659 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116166</link>
    <description>The tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F for the appellant, a registered society and cooperative of women under the Khadi and Village Industry Act, 1956, contesting the denial of benefit under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. due to the municipal council&#039;s proclamation regarding the classification of the factory as a &#039;Rural Area.&#039; Recovery is stayed pending further hearing to examine the definition of &#039;Rural Area&#039; and relevant trade notices. The tribunal disposed of the application with the above terms, reserving the decision on an early out-of-turn hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:10:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 659 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116166</link>
      <description>The tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F for the appellant, a registered society and cooperative of women under the Khadi and Village Industry Act, 1956, contesting the denial of benefit under Notification No. 88/88-C.E. due to the municipal council&#039;s proclamation regarding the classification of the factory as a &#039;Rural Area.&#039; Recovery is stayed pending further hearing to examine the definition of &#039;Rural Area&#039; and relevant trade notices. The tribunal disposed of the application with the above terms, reserving the decision on an early out-of-turn hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>