<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 645 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116152</link>
    <description>Settlement proceedings may deal with a composite show cause notice as a whole where the controversy across the relevant periods is the same, avoiding multiplicity of litigation. In this matter, the Commission treated the earlier admission order as no bar to final settlement of the entire notice. Where the applicant made full disclosure, admitted the duty liability and cooperated, immunity from penalty and prosecution was considered appropriate. However, failure to pay the dues at the proper time justified continued liability to simple interest at 10% per annum on the settled amount, so full immunity from interest was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:40:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 645 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116152</link>
      <description>Settlement proceedings may deal with a composite show cause notice as a whole where the controversy across the relevant periods is the same, avoiding multiplicity of litigation. In this matter, the Commission treated the earlier admission order as no bar to final settlement of the entire notice. Where the applicant made full disclosure, admitted the duty liability and cooperated, immunity from penalty and prosecution was considered appropriate. However, failure to pay the dues at the proper time justified continued liability to simple interest at 10% per annum on the settled amount, so full immunity from interest was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>