<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 644 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116151</link>
    <description>Differential customs duty on the imported goods was waived by a Central Government notification issued under Section 28A of the Customs Act, and the imports fell within the notification period. Because the notification came after the lower authorities decided the refund claim, it had not been considered in their orders. The refund claim therefore had to be reconsidered in light of the notification, and the earlier orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 16:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 644 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116151</link>
      <description>Differential customs duty on the imported goods was waived by a Central Government notification issued under Section 28A of the Customs Act, and the imports fell within the notification period. Because the notification came after the lower authorities decided the refund claim, it had not been considered in their orders. The refund claim therefore had to be reconsidered in light of the notification, and the earlier orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>