<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 729 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the cost of durable and returnable containers should not be included in the assessable value of biscuits. The decision was based on the established factual position and lack of evidence challenging the containers&#039; durability and returnability. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, maintaining consistency with past arrangements and legal principles on assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 729 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the cost of durable and returnable containers should not be included in the assessable value of biscuits. The decision was based on the established factual position and lack of evidence challenging the containers&#039; durability and returnability. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, maintaining consistency with past arrangements and legal principles on assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>