<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 723 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the remission of duty on molasses claimed as a loss during storage. The Commissioner initially rejected the claim due to discrepancies in the records. However, the appellant argued that the loss percentage fell within permissible limits and cited relevant precedents. The Tribunal sided with the appellant, emphasizing the need for consistency in records and adherence to established norms. Consequently, the appellant was granted relief, highlighting the importance of following precedents in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 723 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the remission of duty on molasses claimed as a loss during storage. The Commissioner initially rejected the claim due to discrepancies in the records. However, the appellant argued that the loss percentage fell within permissible limits and cited relevant precedents. The Tribunal sided with the appellant, emphasizing the need for consistency in records and adherence to established norms. Consequently, the appellant was granted relief, highlighting the importance of following precedents in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>