<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 722 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116134</link>
    <description>Rule 57R(2) protected Modvat credit on capital goods used to manufacture an exempted or nil-duty intermediate product, and the proviso requiring the intermediate product to be specified as a final product under Rule 57Q was treated as non-mandatory. Applying the beneficial construction earlier given to Rule 57D(2), the absence of specification of grey fabric as a final product did not defeat substantive credit entitlement. The denial of Modvat credit on capital goods used in such manufacture was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:17:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 722 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116134</link>
      <description>Rule 57R(2) protected Modvat credit on capital goods used to manufacture an exempted or nil-duty intermediate product, and the proviso requiring the intermediate product to be specified as a final product under Rule 57Q was treated as non-mandatory. Applying the beneficial construction earlier given to Rule 57D(2), the absence of specification of grey fabric as a final product did not defeat substantive credit entitlement. The denial of Modvat credit on capital goods used in such manufacture was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>