https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116115 A person who is neither the owner of seized goods nor duly authorised by the owner lacks locus standi to challenge rejection of their release. Mere custody of the goods as manager of a courier company did not create a legal entitlement to appeal, because no ownership or valid authorisation was shown. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the impugned order undisturbed. en-us Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:16:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116115 A person who is neither the owner of seized goods nor duly authorised by the owner lacks locus standi to challenge rejection of their release. Mere custody of the goods as manager of a courier company did not create a legal entitlement to appeal, because no ownership or valid authorisation was shown. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the impugned order undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116115