<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 565 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that duty credit cannot be denied when the job worker pays duty on processed goods, even if the inputs were initially cleared without duty payment. The decision highlighted the importance of following the rules and options provided for duty payment, ensuring that the Government revenue is not compromised. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand against the appellants, providing a favorable outcome by allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:20:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 565 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that duty credit cannot be denied when the job worker pays duty on processed goods, even if the inputs were initially cleared without duty payment. The decision highlighted the importance of following the rules and options provided for duty payment, ensuring that the Government revenue is not compromised. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand against the appellants, providing a favorable outcome by allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>