<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 560 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s Miscellaneous Application for Condonation of Delay and dismissed the appeal due to confusion between Revision and Appeal procedures involving Modvat credit. The Tribunal found no valid explanation for the delay in filing the appeal and emphasized the necessity of following correct legal procedures and timelines in tax credit matters to avoid procedural errors affecting case outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 560 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s Miscellaneous Application for Condonation of Delay and dismissed the appeal due to confusion between Revision and Appeal procedures involving Modvat credit. The Tribunal found no valid explanation for the delay in filing the appeal and emphasized the necessity of following correct legal procedures and timelines in tax credit matters to avoid procedural errors affecting case outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>