https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116094 The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ appeal due to lack of jurisdiction, stating that the writ petition should have been filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The Court did not assess the merits of the case, focusing instead on the jurisdictional issue. It was emphasized that the cause of action must have a factual basis within the Court's jurisdiction, which the appellant failed to establish. The decision underscored the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to binding precedents, particularly in the presence of conflicting judgments from coordinate Benches of the Supreme Court. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:17:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116094 The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ appeal due to lack of jurisdiction, stating that the writ petition should have been filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The Court did not assess the merits of the case, focusing instead on the jurisdictional issue. It was emphasized that the cause of action must have a factual basis within the Court's jurisdiction, which the appellant failed to establish. The decision underscored the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to binding precedents, particularly in the presence of conflicting judgments from coordinate Benches of the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116094