<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 607 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order that increased the value of imported goods based solely on a standing order, as it lacked additional evidence. The Tribunal emphasized considering prices from other imports during the relevant period and rejected reliance on the standing order alone for value determination. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant factors in determining the value of imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 607 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order that increased the value of imported goods based solely on a standing order, as it lacked additional evidence. The Tribunal emphasized considering prices from other imports during the relevant period and rejected reliance on the standing order alone for value determination. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant factors in determining the value of imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>